![]() Is a 970 pro with 3350 MB/s sequential read/write times just plain overkill for DCS. What are some good guidelines for DCS disk performance? Is faster better or is there a limit to how fast DCS requests data? One anecdotal improvement I saw was panning around in external view seemed significantly smoother on the 960 pro than the others, but it could have been the relatively simple mission I had created for testing. ![]() This makes me think that even a regular SSD exceeds the performance that DCS appears to require when launching (or I'm interpreting the results incorrectly). ![]() When I launch DCS, I didn't really notice a 6x reduction in wait times, nor did I ever see the disk reads exceed about 100 Mb/s in task manager. I've also tried running DCS off a Samsung M.2 970 pro connected with a PCIe M.2 adapter, which benchmarks about 6x faster than the 850/860 evos for sequential reads and writes, but about the same for random reads and writes. I run DCS off an M.2 Samsung 860 evo which gets similar Crystal benchmarks as the 850 evo (550 Mb/s sequential read/write, 40-120 Mb/sec for random reads and writes). I've been experimenting with a couple different SSDs in the hope of reducing the load times for DCS, especially in complex missions with the F-14.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |